On 4 Nov 2007, at 12:40, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 18:27:50 +0100, Krzysztof ??elechowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Dnia 03-11-2007, sob o godzinie 08:42 +0000, Ian Hickson napisa??(a):
Ok, I've added a rel value similar to "nofollow" called
"noreferer" that
does this.
While we are unable correct the spelling of "referer", we certainly
need
not duplicate it for "noreferrer". There must be some end to this
self-humiliation.
I think it's way better to stay consistent. Especially as the
feature affects the Referer (sic) header.
I too think Anne is right here — there are enough things that are
inconsistent in the web already. Don't add another thing that requires
me to think. I'll just make mistakes. A markup language should not
require me to think — it should reflect logical structure.
Importantly, outwith the structure, logic dictates contextual
consistency (even if that goes against being consistent with other
contexts).
--
Geoffrey Sneddon
<http://gsnedders.com/>
