>>> While we are unable correct the spelling of "referer", we certainly >>> need not duplicate it for "noreferrer". There must be some end to >>> this self-humiliation. >> >> I think it's way better to stay consistent. Especially as the >> feature affects the Referer (sic) header. > > I too think Anne is right here...
This may be one of those "never been done, so can never happen" things, but couldn't the spec as easily support both? It seems a bit silly that stuff should have to be spelled wrong to work. -- Charles
