Kristof Zelechovski wrote: > There is a difference between the general possibility of making nonsense > statements and an invitation to make them. In my opinion, recommending > metadata about content within itself is such an invitation.
Where do you see an invitation that invites more circularity than just normal document writing? If I say "by Ben Adida" in an article byline, there's circularity. Is that harmful? Is RDFa encouraging more circularity? I don't see it. -Ben
