On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:46:51 +0100, Philipp Serafin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I guess this is more a cosmetic remark, but I thought I'd bring this up
anyway.
I've noticed that the paragraph on the MetaExtensions wiki page[1] still
lists the Microformats process as the only way to get a keyword approved.
The equivalent paragraph on the RelExtensions page[2] had been changed
to "... or must be defined by a W3C specification in the Candidate
Recommendation or Recommendation state." some time ago.
Shouldn't both paragraphs be identical, or are @rel and <meta> values
really handled differently?
They should be identical, feel free to fix the page ;-)
[1] http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/MetaExtensions
[2] http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/RelExtensions
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
