Ian Hickson schrieb:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:46:51 +0100, Philipp Serafin <[email protected]> wrote:
I guess this is more a cosmetic remark, but I thought I'd bring this up
anyway.
I've noticed that the paragraph on the MetaExtensions wiki page[1] still
lists the Microformats process as the only way to get a keyword approved.
The equivalent paragraph on the RelExtensions page[2] had been changed to
"... or must be defined by a W3C specification in the Candidate
Recommendation or Recommendation state." some time ago.
Shouldn't both paragraphs be identical, or are @rel and <meta> values really
handled differently?
They should be identical, feel free to fix the page ;-)
Actually in this instance it's the spec that will be fixed in due course.
Thanks for the info. Didn't know mere mortals could edit that section ;)
Regards,
Philipp Serafin
