On Jan 11, 2009, at 18:52, Calogero Alex Baldacchino wrote:
However, actually it's the same for RDFa attributes, because they're not in the spec. From this point of view, introducing six new attributes, or resorting to an older one is not very different, thus (again) why RDFa and not eRDF?
eRDF is very different in not relying on attributes whose qname contains the substring "xmlns".
-- Henri Sivonen [email protected] http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
