The common JavaScript libraries should be identified using urn
scheme with
JavaScript namespace, as in
<script src="urn:JavaScript:cool-acme-lib:1.0" ></script >
Chris
Chris, this was what I was originally thinking of when I read about
tag-uri's in the Atom Publishing Protocol (which I think are now
defunct).
URN Schemes:
http://www.w3.org/TR/uri-clarification/
I don't know too much about URN Scheme's but I don't think they
provide as much benefit as a hash would be (ugly as they are). In the
original email I alluded to canonical or easy to use identifiers that
would be alias's for the hash:
<!-- Canonical name as an identifier for a JS lib and version -->
<script rel="jquery-1.2.3" src="..." />
Maybe a URN Scheme would be optimal for a canonical name, but I still
like the SHA1 hash for verification/validation and dynamic growth.
- Joe
