On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Mike Wilson<[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, that sort of defeats the point as it will not be possible > to depend on this security function for HTML5 features released > before its appearance in the standard - my idea was that f ex > WebStorage would refer to (and require) the new enhanced > security model.
WebStorage has already shipped in several implementations that do not implement this enhanced security model. Adam
