On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:28:36 +0100, Ian Hickson <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Bruce Lawson wrote:
Seems to me that (current) sections aren't for syndicating (tabs,
chapters etc), while blog posts (currently articles) *are* for potential
syndication (although the cite attribute was recently removed from
article).
I've adjusted the spec's definition more in line with this.
Groovy.
A comment in an article is also marked up as article, but is unlikely to
be a candidate for syndication as it's out of context.
Is this correct?
As James on IRC pointed out:
http://intertwingly.net/blog/comments.html
http://firehose.diveintomark.org/
http://www.zeldman.com/comments/feed/
Also, consider Twitter, Reddit, most forums, etc, where individual
comments are definitely syndicated.
Yup. Makes sense to me.
