Erik Vorhes wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:35 AM, Bruce Lawson<[email protected]> wrote:
there would also need to be a<comment> element
I'd be *slightly* concerned that confusion could arise between a
<comment> element and the<!-- comment syntax -->, at least in
discussion. (I.e., what would "HTML comment" mean?)
We couldn't use a <comment> element anyway for backwards compatibility
reasons. IE does some weird stuff when parsing it.
--
Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software
http://lachy.id.au/
http://www.opera.com/
