Re: [whatwg] behavior

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 01:57:31 -0700

On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:42:10 -0400, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote:

We (Gecko) consider it a bug that a display:none <object> in a document doesn't instantiate the plug-in.

BTW, what is the reason for considering it a bug? Is it because:

{
visibility: hidden;
width: 0;
height: 0;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
line-height: 0;
font-size: 0
border: 0
}

is insufficient and or a pain when you want to load a plug-in but completely hide it so it's as if it's not there layout-wise?

Or, is there some other reason(s)?

Do you know of any sites that would work better if the bug was fixed? Know any sites that'd break or begin to unexpectedly load a bunch of <object>'s that weren't meant to be loaded yet?

If the change is trivial, maybe someone can throw up an experimental FF or webkit binary with the fix. (Or, provide it as an about:config option in the trunk builds like the HTML5 parser option is).

Then, I can test how things work and give feedback.

Thanks

--
Michael

Reply via email to