Re: [whatwg] behavior

Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:30:48 -0700

On 9/21/09 2:01 PM, Michael A. Puls II wrote:
I think Opera even defers
the fetching of display: none images until the display is changed.

With those, I believe, it does a synchronous GET when someone asks about things about the image that need the image data, no?

I have no problem with a load-on-demand setup as long as it's transparent to content...

So, I'm thinking HTML5 should say that display: none specifically (not
other display values) "SHOULD NOT" affect... instead of "MUST NOT"
affect... because there might be cases where display: none deferring is
desired.

I think that makes the model very confusing for authors, but maybe that's just me.

How do you envision an audio object inside <head> working with this setup? Or would it have to go inside <body>, per spec? What about wanting an object that has no rendering at all but lets you interact with it via script and does something useful for you (say S/MIME stuff for a webmail client)?

Of course, if the idea is to support deferring for images, <object> and
<embed> etc. and it's not desired that that support be given through
css, perhaps there should be some attribute that does that. <img
disabled> <object disabled> <embed disabled> etc. where .disabled =
false brings them alive.

I would prefer something like this.  Using CSS for this purpose seems wrong.

-Boris

Reply via email to