On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Oct 12, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> Alex Russell wrote: >>> >>> ... >>> So just to clarify: should we standardize X-UA-Compatible at the IETF, >>> the validator would no longer complain about it, assuming that you'll >>> accept it in the wiki (which I'd like to be clear on)? >>> ... >> >> To standardize it in the IETF, it would probably need to be renamed, >> though. > > And the standard would have to describe what it actually does, which would > probably require some input from Microsoft. At some point, to advance on the > IETF standards track, it would need multiple interoperable implementations. > That prospect does not seem likely.
Unless you count IE-based browsers, such as maxathon, a separate implementation. / Jonas
