On Oct 12, 2009, at 13:09, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Oct 11, 2009, at 11:57 PM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Oct 10, 2009, at 08:20, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
I think the HTML5 requirement should be changed to allow any
header in the Permanent Message Header Field Registry.
Effectively, this would require either an RFC or an Open Standard.
This seems just as good for HTML5's purposes as requiring an RFC.
I disagree unless we really want to enable http-equiv as a way of
specifying browser-only HTTP header equivalents that intermediaries
ignore.
Sorry, my statement was ambiguous. To be more specific:
"I think the HTML5 requirement should be changed to allow any header
in the Permanent Message Header Field Registry to be registered as a
pragma extension (instead of only headers defined by an RFC)."
OK. I misunderstood what you meant.
OTOH, if we want to enable only pragmas that the HTML layer must
recognize for backwards-compatibility, enumerating the permitted
values is quite reasonable.
Are you suggesting that the pragma extensions registry should be
removed entirely?
I'm not sure. I think it would be preferable to stay away from http-
equiv, though.
--
Henri Sivonen
[email protected]
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
