On Mar 15, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Vladimir Vukicevic wrote: > If we wanted to support this across workers (and I think it would be helpful > to figure out how to do so), something like saying that if a canvas object > was passed (somehow) between workers, it would be a copy -- and internally it > could be implemented using copy-on-write semantics.
I had been thinking the same -- it would allow the general case (eg. data is only expected to be used in the worker) to get a mostly free copy. > > - Vlad --Oliver
