"Jonas Sicking" <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/3/17 Ian Hickson <[email protected]>: > > It's not a bad idea... Unfortunately data-* is already being used > quite a > > lot and has been widely advertised, so we have to be careful with > this. > > Anyone else have an opinion on this? > > I don't feel strongly that either name is better. Though I would not > that priv- doesn't make things much clearer since it's totally > undefined who it's private to.
Given that priv-* isn't clearly better, I think it would be better not to annoy early adopters of data-* with a name change. -- Henri Sivonen [email protected] http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
