On 8/11/10 11:48 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
javascript:var start = new Date(); function f(n) { for (var k =
n.firstChild; k; k = n.nextSibling) f(k); } f(document); alert(new
Date() - start)
Er, that had a typo. The correct script is:
javascript:var start = new Date(); function f(n) { for (var k =
n.firstChild; k; k = k.nextSibling) f(k); } f(document); alert(new
Date() - start);
Now the numbers are slightly larger; on the order of 230ms to 350ms.
Barely above human lag-perception. This is on a several-years-old
laptop as hardware.
-Boris
