Re: [whatwg] Device Element

[Bjartur Thorlacius]

On 1/8/11, drese...@thinkdigital.pt <drese...@thinkdigital.pt> wrote:
>  On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 12:24:08 +0000, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
>> What's wrong with access control?
>
>  With access control.. nothing. With kernel ACLs.. everything. That is
>  out of scope here.
>
The system provides access control. What I don't understand is what
you've got against it. I'm not saying ACL must be implemented in kernel.
Run them in Ring 1, userspace or wherever you want to. They're clearly
out of scope of the WHATWG.