On 1/9/11, Aryeh Gregor <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Bjartur Thorlacius <[email protected]> > wrote: >> So, OS permissions are too complex, so you figure it's best to build >> another permission system on top of the existing ones? Why? > > 1) OS permissions are not adequately standardized. Every OS has its > own permissions model. This makes portability hard, and increases the > risk of security bugs caused by the same policy being enforced > differently by different OSes. > Applications need not be aware of the exact permission model used. As you stated yourself, OS are implementing security models accounting for untrusted apps. I find it unnecessary to duplicate the maintenance work.
- Re: [whatwg] Device Element Bjartur Thorlacius
- Re: [whatwg] Device Element dresende
- Re: [whatwg] Device Element Bjartur Thorlacius
- Re: [whatwg] Device Element dresende
- Re: [whatwg] Device Element Bjartur Thorlacius
- Re: [whatwg] Device Element Aryeh Gregor
- Re: [whatwg] Device Element Bjartur Thorlacius
- Re: [whatwg] Device Element Glenn Maynard
- Re: [whatwg] Device Element Bjartur Thorlacius
- Re: [whatwg] Device Element Aryeh Gregor
- Re: [whatwg] Device Element Bjartur Thorlacius
- Re: [whatwg] Device Element Glenn Maynard
- Re: [whatwg] Device Element Bjartur Thorlacius
- Re: [whatwg] Device Element Glenn Maynard
- Re: [whatwg] Device Element dresende
- Re: [whatwg] Device Element Aryeh Gregor
- Re: [whatwg] Device Element Bjartur Thorlacius
