On 9/1/2011 1:30 AM, Anselm Hannemann - Novolo Designagentur wrote:
Am 01.09.2011 um 01:46 schrieb Charles Pritchard:
On 8/31/2011 2:32 PM, Karl Dubost wrote:
Oh, that's not my proposal, that syntax was brought up by Tab Atkins.
It's already available. I was looking into how to handle <img [no
source] style="background: url(..)" />
It may work with the following, now, or at some point in the future:
<img style="content: replaced; background-color: ...;" />
I'd proposed visibility: content-hidden; to be used with background
and border.
Why should we use inline-styles once again? Why should we load content
images with CSS? What about accessibility? Where to add alt-attribute
/ title / ARIA etc.?
They're CSS styles, I'm using inline for demonstrative purposes.
I'd load images because the CSS <image> spec is more powerful than the
HTML image spec,
offering things like -webkit-canvas (soon -element), various background
sizing and fitting routines.
Accessibility is maintained exactly as it was, you'd put the alt
attribute in the image tag.
