6.9.2011 18:43, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

If comments are generally "self-contained compositions", what would be an
example of a composition that is _not_ self-contained?

A <section>  of an article, for example.

I see no reason why a section of an article could not be self-contained. For example, in any lengthy presentation, there should be an introductory part, and it had better be self-contained. So should a summary, and quite often many appendix-like parts.

Besides, referring to markup as defined in HTML5 (which is, no matter whether you think of it as a living standard or a sequence of drafts, something that hasn't been seriously implemented and widely used in this respect) is at a wrong category level. The question "what would be an example of a composition that is _not_ self-contained" really calls for examples of content, no matter what its markup might be.

You seem to think (and the living standard's current manifestation / the current draft may well be based on such thinking too) that "self-contained" means "not part of any other composition". That's not my understanding of "self-contained". Rather, being self-contained means that the presentation is complete, not implying some external content or requiring the recipient to get part of the information from elsewhere. Self-contained presentation is, to me, something that you can read in a bus without any Internet connection or books to consult, without requiring that have read some specific prerequisites.

Here's what Webster's Encyclopedia Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language says about "self-contained": "containing in oneselfor itself all that is necessary; independent".

I don't that this message of main is "self-contained", and typical blog postings are even clearer examples. My message contains a reference to and a quotation from the message being commented on, but it's still very far from being self-contained. One needs to know or learn quite a lot about the topic area, the specific issue being discussed, and the previous discussion to understand this message.

And this applies a bit stronger to, say, comments like "Bullshit!" :-)

--
Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

Reply via email to