On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote: > I just wanted to correct one small thing here. > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote: >> (The difference that the w3c lists were private is not really a >> meaningful difference if we're telling people to join CGs and do >> development there). > > "We" have not done that, but unfortunately nobody called out the bad > suggestion either :-( > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-whatwg-archive/2012Feb/0194.html
I'm not sure what you think it's a bad suggestion? I would say that the CG was more successful in attracting author feedback than WhatWG currently is. / Jonas