On Tue, 5 Mar 2013, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 3/5/13 11:59 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > I don't care about the methods. Putting all of those on Document is > > > fine by me, I think. > > > > > > I care about the named getter being forced onto all documents. > > > > Okay, so that is slightly different from how this thread started out. > > I don't think it is. I don't want to merge the prototype objects for > Document and HTMLDocument, because I don't want to stick a named getter > on every document. > > What happens with individual methods is a separate story.
I'd be fine with having a Document descendant that is used for Documents that have global scopes / browsing contexts / the works, and one that is used for Documents that don't (e.g. createDocument(), XHR); would that address this issue? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
