On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/5/13 3:30 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: >> I'd be fine with having a Document descendant that is used for Documents >> that have global scopes / browsing contexts / the works, and one that is >> used for Documents that don't (e.g. createDocument(), XHR); would that >> address this issue? > > It's one way to address it, yes...
A lot of the stuff that's moving into Document due to this merge is desirable for the SVGWG as well - we'd like to try and eliminate the SVGDocument interface if possible, or if not, at least reduce it to its bare minimum and rely just on Document for most things. ~TJ
