On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:11:32 +0100, David Carlisle <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 05/02/2014 13:24, Simon Pieters wrote:
Is there a situation in which it is conforming to use html:title
outside the <head> in a document where the root is html:html? In
math:annotation-xml?
My reading is yes, and validator.nu at least agrees this is valid
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head><title>k</title>
</head>
<body>
aaa
<math>
<semantics>
<mi>x</mi>
<annotation-xml encoding="text/html"><title>??</title></annotation-xml>
</semantics>
</math>
</body>
</html>
but unlike the svg case MathML doesn't have any special requirements
here, and I don't think it would cause problems if any convenient (for
you) behaviour was defined, or this was declared invalid (and for
example the valid content of annotation-xml encoding="text/html" was the
same as that of html <body>)
Yeah, I think that the content model for annotation-xml with
encoding="text/html" or encoding="application/xhtml+xml" should be flow
content.
--
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
