Glenn Maynard <gl...@zewt.org> writes: > We have an API for compression already. It already supports a > compression level argument for JPEG. Having an equivalent argument > for PNG is a no-brainer. The only difference to JPEG is that it > should be described as the "compression level" rather than "quality > level", since with PNG it has no effect on quality, only the file size > and time it takes to compress.
What benefit does it give then if the result is the same perceptually? -- Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann <http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net>