Glenn Maynard <> writes:

> We have an API for compression already.  It already supports a
> compression level argument for JPEG.  Having an equivalent argument
> for PNG is a no-brainer.  The only difference to JPEG is that it
> should be described as the "compression level" rather than "quality
> level", since with PNG it has no effect on quality, only the file size
> and time it takes to compress.

What benefit does it give then if the result is the same perceptually?

Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann

Reply via email to