On 2014-07-16 12:01, Arpita Bahuguna wrote:
Hi Julian,

Please find my comments inline:

-----Original Message-----
From: whatwg [mailto:whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Julian 
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 3:10 PM
To: Arpita Bahuguna
Cc: wha...@whatwg.org; Arpita Bahuguna
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Proposal to add website-* meta extensions

On 2014-07-16 11:31, Arpita Bahuguna wrote:
Hi Julian,

Thank-you for your views.

Are you suggesting that we instead introduce a new link relation
(perhaps "contact") with tel:/mailto: types for specifying these parameters?

This would involve spec modification. Not sure how developers or
browser vendors take to it.

Why would it involve a spec modification?

Currently the link types defined by the specification are: 

Please correct me if I am wrong but I suspect introducing a new rel type would 
involve modifying the spec as well.

No. There's a Wiki for it.

Adding new meta extensions however would not have any such overhead as far as I 

Was looking for a simpler solution that's quickly implementable.

Why is <meta> any simpler than <link>???

Reply via email to