"take" was suggested in IRC as an alternative to "consume", which has precedence http://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-mutationobserver-takerecords
I'm still worried we're querySelectorAlling (creating long function names for common actions), but I can live with: response.takeBodyAsJSON(). On 21 August 2014 18:27, Jake Archibald <jaffathec...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 21 August 2014 13:27, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Jake Archibald <jaffathec...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > * The as* methods should be directly on the response, and named >> consumeAs*, >> > so response.consumeAsJSON() >> >> Would it be really bad to have these names four characters longer to >> indicate they are about the body of the response? Then we'd have: >> >> consumeBodyAsJSON() >> consumeBodyAsText() >> > > Worried we're making common functions really long here, like > querySelectorAll. > > Going from > > response.body.asJSON() > to > response.consumeAsJSON() > wasn't *too* bad, but > response.consumeBodyAsJSON() > is getting a bit proxyfactorybeangenerator. > > >> >> and >> >> canConsumeBody >> > > This isn't too bad. >
