On Nov 2, 2014, at 20:05 , Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > Third, here's a completely different approach to defining URLs that produces > the same results (modulo one parse error that Anne agrees[2] should changed > in be in the WHATWG spec): > > http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/url.html#url >
I rather like this. The readability is much better (I am not a fan of the current trend of writing specifications in pseudo-basic, which makes life easier for implementers and terrible for anyone else, including authors), and I also think that an approach that doesn’t obsolete RFC 3986 is attractive. David Singer Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
