I'm an implementer (to the fullest extent that one can be one by
modifying existing open source), just following the convention of this
list of stating my use case. The use case reflects reality since it
was implemented last year.

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Domenic Denicola <d...@domenic.me> wrote:
> To be clear:
> Everyone can imagine use cases for playing videos backward. However, so far 
> the only statements we have about implementations are negative. My subthread 
> was more concerned with making the spec reflect current reality. If you can 
> convince implementers to support backward videos, then that's separate, and 
> we can change the spec again.

Reply via email to