> -----Original Message----- > From: Nick Coghlan [mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com] > Sent: quinta-feira, 2 de março de 2017 08:37 > To: Leonardo Bianconi <leonardo.bianc...@eldorado.org.br> > Cc: Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com>; wheel-builders@python.org > Subject: Re: [Wheel-builders] Wheel files for PPC64le > > On 2 March 2017 at 05:28, Leonardo Bianconi > <leonardo.bianc...@eldorado.org.br> wrote: > > Either way, I think the approach of defining an interim ppc64le specific > > target > ABI, > > with a aim of converging back to the common manylinux baseline around the > > time of manylinux3 (aniticipated to be 2020'ish when RHEL 6 & CentOS 6 > support > > ends) is likely to be the best available option. > > So, I though two possibilities for this, put the version "0" (manylinux_0) or > the > characters "beta" (manylinux_beta) for the tag. Is there any technical > objection > for > it? Any other suggestion? > > Given that the baseline images are Ubuntu 14.04 and CentOS 7, how about > calling > it linux2014?
Actually I suggested the CentOS 7 as base just to make both architectures depending of the same system, leaving the ubuntu 14.04 and 15.04 without support, as them are older than CentOS 7, and the backward compatibility may not work. So, as CentOS 7 is from 2016, the suggestions would be linux2016, right? Do you see any issue basing it on CentOS7 and leaving older distros, for example Ubuntu 14.04, without support? Another thinking is the possibility, if the best way is make it support since Ubuntu 14.04, of make Ubuntu (currently ubuntu 14.04) be the base and change to CentOS when both architecture have the same minimum supported version. > > Cheers, > Nick. > > > -- > Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Wheel-builders mailing list Wheel-builders@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/wheel-builders
