On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Breno Leitao <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > On 03/11/2017 01:46 AM, Stefan van der Walt wrote: >> I guess my question was whether the re-usage of manylinux0 is correct. I >> would guess not, if the other PPC build system has different dependencies. > > Right, What would you suggest? What about manylinux2? > > Since manylinux0 is CentOS 5, manylinux 1 is CentOS 6, and manylinux2 is > CentOS 7
You've got an off-by-one error :-). manylinux1 is CentOS 5. I'm a little nervous about predicting what manylinux3 will be when we haven't even defined manylinux2, but OTOH I guess there isn't really any good reason *not* to define manylinux3 right now -- CentOS 7 isn't going anywhere, and if something major changes between now and CentOS 6's EOL that makes some other system more attractive as a base than CentOS 7, we can always make that manylinux4. -n -- Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org _______________________________________________ Wheel-builders mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/wheel-builders
