Thanks for the link. When it's in jclouds, I'll cut an issue for whirr.
-Kelvin On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Tom White <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for supporting this in jclouds/Whirr. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-16 may be related. > > Cheers, > Tom > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]> wrote: > > ok. let's take this to jclouds-dev google group, if you don't mind. > > > > -A > > > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Kelvin Kakugawa <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Thanks for the heads up. > >> > >> I'm actively working on this, now. If you want to coordinate, I'd be > happy > >> to. > >> > >> -Kelvin > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, Kevin. > >>> > >>> I think the easiest way is to make a jclouds api (archetype) called > >>> "byon" (bring your own nodes:) ) or something. Pallet has something > >>> similar already and there's a clear need in jclouds to address this. > >>> Benefit is that the control logic of scripts and such would be > >>> normalized. > >>> > >>> What priority do you have for this? Sometimes, just someone to Q/A > >>> helps make something like this happen. > >>> > >>> -Adrian > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Kelvin Kakugawa <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > Hi, > >>> > > >>> > We've been working on distributed tests for Cassandra. However, for > >>> speed > >>> > of iteration, we'd like to add support for deployment to dedicated > >>> servers. > >>> > > >>> > Should a new jclouds archetype be created? Or, should we replace > jclouds > >>> > for deployment to a dedicated cluster? > >>> > > >>> > -Kelvin > >>> > > >>> > >> > > >
