Thanks for the fast reply. I will make the change as discussed.

Later we should probably put in place a similar convention for tarball
urls. (whirr.<service>.tarball.url)

Cheers,

-- Andrei

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Lars George <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> Tom and I had this discussion a while back, I think one of the issues
> has the notes. I lost momentum since we had no clear consensus, I am
> OK either way as long as it is consistent.
>
> I do favor the "." approach HBase uses.
>
> +1
>
> Lars
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Andrei Savu <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Looks like we a have an naming inconsistency for specifying install /
>> configure functions across services:
>>
>> HBase uses whirr.hbase.(install | configure)-function
>> Hadoop uses whirr.hadoop-(install | configure)-function
>> ZooKeeper uses whirr.zookeeper-(install | configure)-function
>>
>> * Note the . (dot) versus - (dash) after service name
>>
>> I suggest that we should go for:
>>
>> whirr.<service>.(start | stop | install | configure)-function
>>
>> and create a helper function in ClusterActionHandlerSupport for
>> retrieving the value.
>>
>> I will address this in WHIRR-334 [1].
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-334
>>
>> -- Andrei Savu / andreisavu.ro
>>
>

Reply via email to