good point for panels/borders, but what about pages? like the ones in examples.
also what about .properties files? do those need the headers? i dont think html/propreties/small js should be considered source. what about a tiny javascript file that sits next to a component and is loaded via PackagedTextTemplate, interpolated, and inlined in the html. how are we going to get rid of that header? -Igor On 10/4/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not sure I understand. What prevents you from putting the header _before_ <wicket:panel> ? -Matej Igor Vaynberg wrote: > why would we want to stream the header to the client though? it would be > silly. > > someone uses a tabbedpanel - and all of a sudden they have a huge apache > header in their client's html. include two tabbed panels and you get two > headers. its pretty silly, considering the size of tabbedpanel.html [1]. we > have a lot of small files like this, it would be insane to have apache > headers in them. > > [1] > http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/wicket-extensions/src/java/wicket/extensions/markup/html/tabs/TabbedPanel.html?revision=7095&view=markup > > > -Igor > > > On 10/3/06, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Eelco Hillenius wrote: >> > On 10/3/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Several things: >> >> >> >> - which files are required to have the ASF license >> > >> > If we can avoid it, by any means please NOT in the html, javascript >> > and css files. That would just be totally horrible imo. >> >> As far as I am aware the copyright headers have to be in everything that >> is copyrighted by the ASF, i.e. all files. >> >> That is certainly the case on all the projects I am currently involved >> with in the ASF. >> >> Ross >> >
