The package is part of the core project. These will be part of the release. The only thing I don't release (yet) is the wicket-portlet-examples project as I don't/didn't have the time to encorporate it into the build.
So if anything is already fixed in the portlet package, that will be released as a part of the wicket package. Martijn On 10/27/06, Sean C. Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Will Wicket 1.2.3 include any fixes/enhancements in the portlet package? https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/wicket/src/main/java/wicket/protocol/http/portlet/ Sean >-- Original Message -- >Reply-To: [email protected] >Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 21:18:55 +0200 >From: "Martijn Dashorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [email protected] >Subject: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.2.3 coming sunday > > >All, > >After the luke warm responses on outstanding bugs for Wicket 1.2, I >want to move to release 1.2.3. > >This release contains: > - wicket > - wicket-extensions > - wicket-examples > - wicket-quickstart > - wicket-spring > - wicket-spring-examples > - wicket-spring-annot > - wicket-spring-annot-examples > - wicket-auth-roles > - wicket-auth-roles-examples > >The release will be released outside of Apache on the sourceforge.net >servers. The releases will contain a notice file stating that this is >*not* an Apache endorsed release, as will the website and the release >notes. > >The fact that we are building a non-Apache endorsed release means that >the release will not include 'incubating' in the name and version, and >that we don't have to check the license headers and can include the >LGPL licensed DatePicker in extensions. These things will have to >change for releases built and released inside the ASF. > >Included in this vote is the proposal that we wait one week for >marking the 1.2 release final and go into maintenance mode only for >1.2. This means that this time we *WILL* create a wicket-1.2.x branch >for 1.2 when the week has passed without serious bugs. I know that it >will be a pain to maintain and fix bugs in 3 branches, but it is >something we have to do someday soon. > >Wicket 1.3 can then progress in branch 1.x and we can make our first >steps towards graduation. > >May I have your votes please? This vote will close sunday morning, CET. > >[-1] Don't release 1.2.3 >[ 0] I don't care >[+1] Please, I've waited toooooo long for this already > >Martijn > >-- ><a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket";>Vote</a> >for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket";>Wicket</a> >at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best Stuff in >the World!</a>
-- <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket";>Vote</a> for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket";>Wicket</a> at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best Stuff in the World!</a>
