> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > I don't really think so. The only difference is that we don't > redirect to hybrid url, but stick to the original bookmarkable urls. > > It just doesn't make sense for e.g. google to index hybrid > url, if it can index the original (bookmarkable) one. > Although if this proves to be a problem it would be very easy > to turn this behavior off. > > Anyway, no different content is served. It seem very unlikely > that a crawler would ban this.
ok, lets say it wont be treated as cloaking: how would you know that a spider is here and not a normal visitor ?? i dont know a save way to find this out... even though you might want to ask google itself if this is ok - last statement i know is very strict: "Don't employ cloaking or sneaky redirects. Don't create multiple pages, subdomains, or domains with substantially duplicate content." ( http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769 ) and we would violate both these rules... basically, the key would be to choose 1 behaviour and use it all the time. > It really doesn't make difference here whether the parameters > are named or indexed. It's a separate strategy which only > parses the mounted urls. ok Regards Korbinian > > > > i also dont understand your format ... why do we need these > brackets [] ? > > and why do we need a pagemap behind? cant this just go into > the session? > No, it can't. It's just how wicket urls work. This is > bookmarkable url. > It contains information on how to create page instance. And > also it can > (optionally) contain information about in which pagemap the > created page should be stored. > > -Matej > > > > just my 2 cents, > > > > Regards > > > > Korbinian > > > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> Von: Matej Knopp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Gesendet: Samstag, 4. November 2006 13:56 > >> An: [email protected] > >> Betreff: URL scheme for Wicket 2.0 > >> > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Proposal+of+ > >> URL+scheme+for+Wicket+2 > >> > >> What do you think? > >> > >> -Matej > >> > >> > > > > > >
