Korbinian Bachl wrote:
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
I don't really think so. The only difference is that we don't
redirect to hybrid url, but stick to the original bookmarkable urls.
It just doesn't make sense for e.g. google to index hybrid
url, if it can index the original (bookmarkable) one.
Although if this proves to be a problem it would be very easy
to turn this behavior off.
Anyway, no different content is served. It seem very unlikely
that a crawler would ban this.
ok, lets say it wont be treated as cloaking: how would you know that a
spider is here and not a normal visitor ?? i dont know a save way to find
this out... even though you might want to ask google itself if this is ok -
last statement i know is very strict:
"Don't employ cloaking or sneaky redirects.
Don't create multiple pages, subdomains, or domains with substantially
duplicate content."
( http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769 )
and we would violate both these rules... basically, the key would be to
choose 1 behaviour and use it all the time.
How would I detect a crawler? By the user agent string.
This is not cloaking. Nor it is a sneaky redirect! In fact, there is no
redirect for crawler at all.
The only difference is that if there is a link in document
/my/page
and crawler follows the link, the page gets displayed
However, if a regular visitor (not a crawler) follows the link, he is
redirected to /my/page[24] (for example)
It's either a) or b). Google (nor any other crawler) won't see both of
those.
The idea is to hide as much session relative stuff from google as possible.
It really doesn't make difference here whether the parameters
are named or indexed. It's a separate strategy which only
parses the mounted urls.
ok
Regards
Korbinian
i also dont understand your format ... why do we need these
brackets [] ?
and why do we need a pagemap behind? cant this just go into
the session?
No, it can't. It's just how wicket urls work. This is
bookmarkable url.
It contains information on how to create page instance. And
also it can
(optionally) contain information about in which pagemap the
created page should be stored.
-Matej
just my 2 cents,
Regards
Korbinian
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Matej Knopp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Samstag, 4. November 2006 13:56
An: [email protected]
Betreff: URL scheme for Wicket 2.0
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Proposal+of+
URL+scheme+for+Wicket+2
What do you think?
-Matej
