If you're going that far, why not keep that too? Then Wicket 1.3 would simply be a Java 1.4 port of Wicket 2.0 :)
(Okay okay, you'll loose backward compatibility.)
Erik.
Matej Knopp schreef:
Yeah... Slowly I start to think that it would be less work to branch trunk and "undo" the constructor change and generics :)-Matej
-- Erik van Oosten http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
