Yeah, I think the idea was to swap them. But Igor and the others who worked on that project may be able to say more about this.
Eelco On 12/9/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
wasn't that the one that should replace the current one? So then it is more like a swap? On 12/9/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All > > I was going to move the datepicker from trunk to wicket-stuff, but > there is already a wicket-contrib-datepicker there. What do we do with > that project? > > As I already moved the 1.3 datepicker to wicket-stuff under > wicket-contrib-datepicker in 1.2 branch, I propose to either move the > current trunk to a new project dir at wicket-stuff, or donate it to > Apache and develop it there. > > [ ] rename current trunk/wicket-contrib-datepicker to > trunk/wicket-a-better-datepicker > [ ] move it to apache > [ ] ...? > > Martijn > > -- > Vote for Wicket at the > http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket > Wicket 1.2.3 is as easy as 1-2-3. Download Wicket now! > http://wicketframework.org >
