fine. you dont use maven, but we do. why should we spend extra time packaging things in a zip, blah, blah when they are easily available to you from the maven repo?
http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/wicket/1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT/ http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/wicket/wicket/1.2.4/ rather then downloading a zip that has everything, just download the parts that you need -igor On 1/23/07, Erik van Oosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martijn Dashorst wrote: > Other peops than core devs please voice your opinion. The > distributions are made for you. > - split zips into source and binary distributions, going with the > default maven assemblies +1 > - remove site docs from distributions, only include a readme, the > docs can be found online (http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKETxSITE) +1 > - create one wicket-all zip with all wicket jars +0 > - add source-jar/javadoc-jar to the zips (currently left out) +10 I don't like maven (even though I use it from time to time), and I am sure not going to let Maven touch my Eclipse files. Perhaps in 3 years time. > Questions: > - do we need to support ant builds for the source distribution? Not for me. > - do we need to supply all dependencies in the source and/or binary > distribution You could make it optional. Spring does this and at times I have found this very convenient. Regards, Erik. -- Erik van Oosten http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
