if we already have the site there, then why are we still hosting it on
sf.net?

-igor


On 1/24/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

-100

We already have the site up on apache: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKETxSITE

Martijn

On 1/24/07, Eelco Hillenius (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>     [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12467112]
>
> Eelco Hillenius commented on WICKET-235:
> ----------------------------------------
>
> +100
>
> > clean up info on site
> > ---------------------
> >
> >                 Key: WICKET-235
> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-235
> >             Project: Wicket
> >          Issue Type: Bug
> >          Components: site
> >            Reporter: Eelco Hillenius
> >         Assigned To: Martijn Dashorst
> >
> > There is some horribly outdated stuff on the site, e.g. on the FAQ:
http://wicket.sourceforge.net/faqs.html, 'How can I hide markup and/or
components?' which uses a pre 1.0 way of using wicket ids. Any such
information should be removed from the site, so that we end up just having
some plain info that won't be outdated soon. For anything we have the WIKI
and mailing list archives and examples etc.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
>


--
Vote for Wicket at the
http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

Reply via email to