you have to understand how frustrating this is. it happened when MVEL came out and now its happening with t5. our users read about something new and shiny and then post emails like yours to the list without doing any research. so what happens then? it us, the core developers, who have to go out and spend our time doing the research. our user list has about 500+ users, and there are less then 10 core developers, its not a good ratio to be on the receiving end of. we already spend _a lot_ of our personal time helping our users with wicket, but when it comes to these theoretical comparisons it just gets annoying.
it wouldve been much nicer if you did the research and provided an initial comparison yourself, is that too much to ask for/expect in your view? then someone from the core devs would fix whatever they thought was faulty. but your message really sounded provocative/trolling. -igor On 2/5/07, Jon Steelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eelco, Good points about the planning with the unanticipated incubation & book writing. On 2/5/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > so please next time before posting something like this at least read up > Igor, Wow, nice & complete post. Your final line changes the tone of your post a bit. No doubt your attitude is justifiable. Nevertheless, some of those who watch this list just aren't going to be able to form a thorough response like yours and yet we benefit from analysis by core developers and so I ask. Maybe it would help to think of me as a friendly someone who is interested in the best possible market perception of Wicket, Wicket as it may be perceived by people doing less than ideal framework comparisons. On 2/5/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/5/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's apples and pears really. > > eelco you are in america now! so its apples and oranges! > I think its the apple & pear martinis. Thanks, Jon
