those are the kinds of things that are going to break and we have to "fix" for terracotta somehow in their config.
-igor On 2/21/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
really? How are they doing the url compressor stuff then? Or i guess they have special support for soft/weak References .. because you can't serialize a weak or soft reference. If you make a test, use the WebCompressing strategy and look what happens with the URLCompressor class. johan On 2/21/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > right, thats what i meant > > -igor > > > On 2/21/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > And they don't have to. At least not according to what they are doing > with > > it. > > > > Eelco > > > > On 2/21/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > they dont > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > On 2/21/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > i am very interested how the handle the special serialization cases. > > > > like readObject and writeObject methods or writeReplace.. > > > > > > > > johan > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2/21/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Looking forward to it! I just started checking out Terracotta > > today... > > > > > > > > > > One of the great things about Terracotta that I wasn't aware of > > > > > yesterday, as that Terracotta can fail over when you run out of > > memory > > > > > on a box. And that's kind of the same thing (not quite, but in the > > > > > same line of thought) we are trying to achieve with our new > session > > > > > store implementation. The SLCSS implementation will always have > the > > > > > advantage that there is unlimited back button support. For what it > > is > > > > > worth. But I think that even running Terracotta on the same > machine > > - > > > > > when the Terracotta server runs out of RAM it'll start using the > > disk > > > > > - to prevent running out of memory is a viable option. And > > Terracotta > > > > > is by default a lot more efficient in how it does that than any > > normal > > > > > serialization based solution out there. > > > > > > > > > > Anyway, like I said, I think we should definitively look in this > > > > > direction as well. We already were in fact, but it deserves more > > > > > priority. > > > > > > > > > > Ryan, we'll be very interested to hear your experiences with it. > > > > > > > > > > Eelco > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
