Frank Bille wrote:
Ok +1 on releasing to IPMC.
I don't expect them to just eat it without comments. I guess the biggest
point will be the license header aspect. I would therefor appreciate if we
could agree on what I have wrote in the wiki[1] or else reach consensus on
what our opinion is on this.
Frank
[1]:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Wicket+1.3.0+incubating+alpha+1
Agreed. I think "But we have also decided..." on the wiki is a bit, err,
strong. It makes us look like we're ignoring the ASF's rules when we're
actually trying to keep everyone happy.
Thoughts:
- It can probably be argued that properties files don't have any degree
of creativity in them.
- I don't really see why we don't put a license header in the
examples/test HTML files. It wouldn't kill us. You could argue that
the test HTML files are nearly all auto-generated, but given we do
the autogeneration, it would be pretty easy to add in.
Good work, Martijn - it's much appreciated.
Al
