On 4/13/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm mainly thinking nice but do you have any concrete plans (components, behavior) for it?
I think just a behavior (or class) with some examples. The philosophy of the library is to not create 200 classes for every effect known to man, which is what moo, rico, dojo and scriptaculous do. This library is an enabling library for effects. I think the library is very on par with Wicket's principles (small footprint, enabling instead of prescribing). Unfortunately, Bernard (the author) doesn't have a community of users, so support should come from us and go through him. Before I commit myself to implementing the library, I'd like to hear more opinions on the animate.js itself. I'd hate to have spent hours implementing to find out it is not accepted because it is 24kb, or some other mismatch. Of course, that risk is always there, but getting the library some attention is step 1. Getting it first approved is step 2 (that should be the result of this thread). Step 3 is what you're getting to :) Martijn -- Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
