Martijn Dashorst wrote: > > On 4/13/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> And I also remember reading Nathan's blog with a reference to it... :) > > A google didn't give results for animate.js, however, he recently > created his own scrolling effect [1]. I don't think his effort is > comparable to animate.js, though fun enough :) > > Martijn >
Pshawwwww! My impression is that these effects are much less interesting to users than they are to us, and generally aren't worth the trouble. And when I have a problem I need to solve with animation (or so I convince myself), they never seem to do exactly what I need. But people tend to like working on effects libs ;) and, if Wicket ends up integrating one that doesn't suck (and doesn't require a huge js), I and everyone else will probably find something to use it for. And the more it exposes handy util functions (like getScrollPosition!) for coding things yourself, the better. Nathan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-proposal--adopt-animate.js-into-wicket-extensions-as-our-core-effects-library-tf3570196.html#a9979955 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
