Hi Jean-Baptiste, Friday, April 27, 2007, 9:25:43 AM, you wrote:
> Could you please test if it works for you so that we can fix it > for the release? At this stage, I'd have thought that the only way it could get to be part of the ongoing 1.3.0-incubating-beta1 (which is what I assume you're referring to - it's unclear, but that's the only release I'm aware of) is if we pulled that and restarted from scratch. I don't expect that, which brings me onto my next point... > I raised the priority to critical because I'd > really like it to be part of the next train. IMO, that's a /really/ bad idea - to me, any "Critical" issues would be those that either break the system completely or have security implications - in those cases, we might well be justified in pulling any ongoing release or rushing out a 1.2.x release In this case however, I'd have a hard job accepting this to be even a "Major" issue, let alone "Critical" - Surely the answer to getting it available is to get it into SVN, then if the original reporter needs it stat, they can pull it from SVN themselves? /Gwyn
