and there will be another beta release after this and again after that.
the only blocker bugs the current one can encouter are legal once or another
none apache way of releasing ..
ofcourse if wicket wouldn't run at all that would also be a case but that
isn't the case because all of our 500+ test do run
and http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/index.html also runs as far as i can see
johan
On 4/27/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Martijn Dashorst:
> On 4/27/07, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Friday, April 27, 2007, 9:25:43 AM, you wrote:
> >
> > > Could you please test if it works for you so that we can fix
> > > it for the release?
> >
> > At this stage, I'd have thought that the only way it could get
> > to be part of the ongoing 1.3.0-incubating-beta1 (which is
> > what I assume you're referring to - it's unclear, but that's
> > the only release I'm aware of) is if we pulled that and
> > restarted from scratch.
Sure, but anyway we'll need to push another release because of
SLF4J and onAttach() refactor. And marking it as critical was
just to stand out from the mass of issues filed under the "Major"
priority, nothing serious indeed. Nothing urgentish, just that it
would be nice to fix in a timely manner.
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
