[X] I'm ready to freeze the codebase for RC bug fixing.

[ ] Hold your horses, we REALLY MUST (fill in the blank) ______ first.


Jonathan Locke wrote:
> 
> 
> I'd like to propose that we freeze the codebase now so we can work on
> bugs over the next few weeks for a Release Candidate.  This is quite
> critical timing NOW for people who have been promised that a mid-June 
> or early July launch of a commercial product on Wicket would be workable.  
> I know I am one such person, but I can also point to other such promises 
> made by the dev team (myself, eelco, others) on this mailing list.
> 
> This said, I'm not so hell-bent on shipping that I'd argue for a freeze 
> before fixing something that's truly important.  But we do really need to 
> wrap this up as soon as humanly possible so we can ship a FINAL product
> in just a few very short weeks.  So, here's the vote:
> 
> [ ] I'm ready to freeze the codebase for RC bug fixing.
> 
> [ ] Hold your horses, we REALLY MUST (fill in the blank) ______ first.
> 
> NOTE: If someone comes up with a good reason not to freeze, we can 
> revote with that on the ballot.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Code-Freeze-for-RC-tf3735383.html#a10456210
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to